Monday, January 29, 2007

Spices - Antioxidant Source Throughout the Ages

Spices are the most antioxidant-rich of all food types and
they contain other important compounds that have had
profound health benefits on mankind throughout the ages.
The evolution of spices in our diets is a fascinating story
that shows how important spices are to our health as much
today as they were eons ago.

Thousands of years ago our hunter/gatherer forebears were
forced to adapt to a wide range of climatic and other
environmental conditions. Thus, before agrarian societies
developed, humans consumed a wide variety of plant species.
Some of these plants contained the basic macro and
micronutrients needed for survival (carbohydrates, fats,
proteins, vitamins and minerals). Many of the pungent,
stronger-tasting, and richly coloured plants also contained
an array of "non-nutritive compounds" that had profound
health benefits.

Today we know that the piquant flavours and bright colours
characteristic of spices are hallmarks of the important
phytochemicals these plants contain. The resilience that
characterizes many spice plants means that, during times of
famine, pestilence and drought, these are often the last
edible plants to survive. When taken alone many of them may
be very unpleasant to eat. However, these foods, in the
absence of tastier alternatives, were frequently the only
forms of nourishment available to our ancestors. This was a
fortuitous dietary hardship and one which resulted in
unwitting, but important, self-medication.

However when agrarian communities began to form, the
variety of plant species consumed by these societies
decreased and they became dependent on a small selection of
crops and a limited variety of wild plants. As our
forebears were forced to eat "spicy" foods out of
necessity, they probably enjoyed the intense flavors of
these plants. Another factor that influenced their
palatability was the relative strength of flavors between
different foods. To understand this, it is necessary to
consider that most of the fruit and vegetable species eaten
by early societies were stronger tasting and less sweet
than they are today. In fact, the majority of modern
plant-food cultivars bear very little resemblance to those
varieties that grew thousands of years ago: the bitter,
sour and astringent flavors that characterized fruits such
as apples, melons, pears and many others have been bred out
by generations of selective propagation.

As hunter-gatherer peoples began to be replaced by agrarian
societies, motives for the consumption of spices began to
change. Among settled societies, spices were the source of
flavorings and colorings that could be used to augment the
more monotonous diets based on a restricted number of
crops. Also, in order to establish food security, these
societies began to store the plants they grew or animals
they killed. Drying of food was one solution, as was the
use of the refrigerant effect of the low temperatures found
at higher altitudes and latitudes. However, until recent
times, the desiccation and freezing of food was not a
viable option for those living in hot, humid climates;
these societies discovered chemical preservation, in the
form of salt and spices. As the former was only available
in certain areas spices were often the only other option to
protect food from insect infestation and microbial
putrefaction.

We now know that many of the strongly flavoured
phytochemicals which give plants protection against insect
and microbial attack are the same compounds that "preserve"
our bodies, by protecting us against degenerative diseases.

Today spices are consumed in much greater quantity and
variety in warm, humid countries than in colder climates.
India and Thailand have the highest consumption of spices;
the warm Mediterranean countries follow somewhat behind
these and other Eastern countries but are ahead of the
United States. Chilly Scandinavian countries have the
lowest spice consumption of all. Moreover, the importance
of spices in helping to prevent chronic degenerative
disease can be seen to correspond to the varying levels of
spice utilization that occurs across different temperature
zones. Cold countries – typically the most developed
countries – tend to have much higher incidences of chronic
degenerative diseases when compared to hotter regions.

The dearth of spices in the diets of those of us living in
most Western countries means that we are depriving our
bodies of the important compounds that have, since time
immemorial, been used by our physiological and homeostatic
mechanisms to protect us from many diseases. We need to
consume lots of spices on a daily basis as they can make us
feel better, think better, age more slowly, and help us to
resist the onslaught of scourges like cardiovascular
disease, cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and other
chronic degenerative disorders.


----------------------------------------------------
Dr Keith Scott is a medical doctor with a special interest
in nutrition and complementary therapies. He has written
several books including "Medicinal Seasonings, The Healing
Power of Spices" and "Natural Home Pharmacy". Find out why
spices are the "Missing Links" in nutrition at:
http://www.medspice.com


--

Banning Trans Fats: Out Of The Frying Pan, Into The Fire

Hi Matt

Please accept the following article for possible
publication in 'HealthandFitnessFanatic',


Banning Trans Fats: Out Of The Frying Pan, Into The Fire
Copyright (c) 2007 Debbie Fontana

Studies have shown that trans fats reduce our levels of HDL
(the good cholesterol) and increase our levels of LDL (the
bad cholesterol). All of which may be bad for your heart.

So cities across the US have either already banned trans
fats from their restaurants or are considering doing so.
All in the name of protecting the public health.

Also, many food companies are reformulating their foods to
eliminate trans fats. But then they have to. Otherwise,
they'll be portrayed as the bad guys trying to make a buck
off the poor, unsuspecting public by poisoning us with
their unhealthy foods.

The campaign to raise public awareness of the dangers of
trans fats has led many consumers to believe that a ban
will be healthy for them. So there are many people who are
all for it.

**But The Hype Has Just Begun**

In fact, a recent study actually tried to link trans fats
to infertility.

Even nutritionist Marion Nestle, PhD, MPH, a professor at
New York University, expressed skepticism about that
conclusion in an article recently published on WebMD.

So are city governments justified in banning trans fats
from our foods? Or are these local governments making a
mistake because of all the anti-trans fat hype?

Regardless of how you feel about the government legislating
what we eat, here's the problem.

Trans fats are being replaced in many foods by a new type
of fat called interesterified fats.

But according to the results of a study published in the
journal, Nutrition and Metabolism, interesterified fats may
be even more dangerous for us than trans fats.

You see, interesterified fats also lower our levels of HDL
(the good cholesterol). Just like trans fats. So there's
still a heart health issue.

**But Now There's A New Health Risk**

Interesterified fats were found to significantly increase
blood sugar and depress insulin. Which may increase your
risk for diabetes. Or cause potential problems for you if
you already have diabetes.

If you remember, trans fats replaced saturated fats years
ago because saturated fats were supposed to be unhealthy.
At the time, trans fats were believed to be healthier.

So much for that conclusion. But it gets worse.

These new interesterified fats were found to increase blood
sugar by 20% more than good old saturated fats.

That was in a mere four weeks. Imagine what would happen
over a longer period of time.

**Out Of The Frying Pan, Into The Fire**

It seems like every time the food police insist on changing
the type of fats found in our food, they introduce new and
potentially more dangerous health risks for us.

If you're concerned about this new diabetes risk, you can
check the ingredient list of your foods if it's available.
Interesterified fats are labelled as "fully hydrogenated
oil."

But maybe it's time to consider another course. Maybe we
shouldn't be reformulating our foods after every study. And
we certainly shouldn't be banning foods unless we're sure
the alternatives are safer.

Most importantly, maybe it's time for the food police to
get off their high horses and quit telling the rest of us
how to eat. They don't exactly have a good track record.

**Should We Stop The Trans Fat Bans Before It's Too Late?**

I'm not arguing that trans fats are healthy. But I think
it's a foolish mistake to reformulate all of our foods
until more studies have been done. We need reasonable proof
that we've found a safer alternative.

If you're concerned about the health risks from these new
fats, you may want to get in touch with your local
legislators. And stop the ban on trans fats until we know
for sure that we aren't jumping out of the frying pan and
into the fire.


----------------------------------------------------
Debbie Fontana is a full-time author and business owner who
specializes in writing about health, weight loss, and
nutrition. She invites you to visit her blog and post your
comments about the ban on trans fats. Do you agree?
Disagree? Do you think the food police are helping or
hurting us? Please post your comments at
http://www.ILoveToCheatDiet.com/blog/trans-fat-hysteria